From: ytomino <aghia05@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Question about library-level functions
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2012-12-16T05:07:13-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b80e2782-587c-4f0f-b854-64525d000bf0@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7a82a85-48e4-4ded-b090-06f62bd3b0b6@googlegroups.com>
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 7:21:23 PM UTC+9, AdaMagica wrote:
> Creating via anonymous access is evil - how can ou ever deallocate it? This should be verboten by the language.
I do'nt intent to deallocate it at my code.
However, I think, it's able to be deallocated by a named access type as long as these types use same storage pool shown by pragma Default_Storage_Pool.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-16 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-15 3:38 Question about library-level functions ytomino
2012-12-15 9:47 ` AdaMagica
2012-12-15 10:50 ` ytomino
2012-12-15 11:38 ` AdaMagica
2012-12-17 19:49 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-12-18 2:26 ` ytomino
2012-12-15 15:23 ` sbelmont700
2012-12-16 6:09 ` ytomino
2012-12-16 9:43 ` Simon Wright
2012-12-16 10:21 ` AdaMagica
2012-12-16 13:07 ` ytomino [this message]
2012-12-16 18:31 ` Simon Wright
2012-12-18 3:18 ` ytomino
2012-12-18 0:07 ` Randy Brukardt
2012-12-16 13:34 ` ytomino
2012-12-16 15:54 ` AdaMagica
2012-12-18 0:09 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox