From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@d2-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Subject: Re: aunit?
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:17:34 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-04-15T12:17:34+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7gt8u$m6e$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x7v7ka8ympd.fsf@smaug.pushface.org
Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote:
:
: We have been using it and getting on well. The only problem is that
: the source as supplied doesn't obey ACT's coding style, so if you use
: -gnaty you get lots of warnings ..
Always wear your tie fixed with a silver needle, otherwise
the code can't be correct :-) SCNR.
(Some studies seem to show that coding standards
having to do solely with typographical layout do _not_ lead to
increased productivity, or reliability. Example:
http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/lh8/pubs/pubist602s/MISRAC.pdf)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-15 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-05 20:45 aunit? chris.danx
2003-04-06 9:55 ` aunit? Simon Wright
2003-04-15 12:17 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2003-04-15 16:06 ` aunit? Stephen Leake
2003-04-16 20:39 ` aunit? Georg Bauhaus
2003-04-16 21:14 ` aunit? Stephen Leake
2003-04-17 9:59 ` Ada programs depend on fonts (was: aunit?) Georg Bauhaus
2003-04-17 17:19 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox