From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Delays for implementations of Fortran features
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:19:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-01-20T02:19:10-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7a0fa1f-ac15-4992-b888-ed257690f9c1@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lbgl80$n0m$1@dont-email.me>
> I _really_ like Wirth's approach with his active effort to reduce a
> language to it's required core elements (I'm thinking about the Oberon
> variants here). (Simon)
Yes, fine approach and language. I've tried it some years ago and didn't stick with it because the implementation was too limited and non portable and still a little buggy I think. I'll have to check how it is now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-20 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-18 12:40 Delays for implementations of Fortran features Colin Paul Gloster
2014-01-18 13:03 ` Simon Clubley
2014-01-18 14:37 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2014-01-18 15:20 ` Simon Clubley
2014-01-19 4:07 ` Dan'l Miller
2014-01-19 11:54 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2014-01-19 12:59 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-19 13:03 ` Nasser M. Abbasi
2014-01-19 13:26 ` Bill Findlay
2014-01-19 13:50 ` Simon Clubley
2014-01-19 14:06 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-19 14:51 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-01-20 10:19 ` Marius Amado-Alves [this message]
2014-01-25 15:44 ` darek
2014-01-25 21:46 ` darek
2014-01-20 10:15 ` Marius Amado-Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox