From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Aspect CPU
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-01-15T14:10:16-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b778635f-5416-4a76-b654-1c2e0e544514@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lb6qeq$4ph$1@dont-email.me>
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:18:34 PM UTC-8, J-P. Rosen wrote:
> Le 15/01/2014 21:00, Simon Wright a �crit :
>
> > Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:
> >> By the way, do you mind to tell which
> >> section of RM showing this declarative syntax.
>
> Yeap, normally the aspect should go after the type definition, but in
> the case of a task type, it was felt that it would put them too far
> away, at a place where nobody would see it.
It is good to know the rationale behind it. Thank you for pointing it out.
A. Vo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-15 1:56 Aspect CPU Anh Vo
2014-01-15 7:06 ` Egil H H
2014-01-15 16:54 ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 20:00 ` Simon Wright
2014-01-15 20:18 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-15 22:10 ` Anh Vo [this message]
2014-01-15 22:04 ` Anh Vo
2014-01-15 23:25 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox