Re: doint use debian, use bsd or archlinux

[darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com>]

On Sunday, July 7, 2013 7:55:29 PM UTC, johannes falcone wrote:
> On Saturday, July 6, 2013 11:55:03 PM UTC-7, Simon Wright wrote:
> 
> > johannes falcone writes:
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > > netbsd
> 
> > 
> 
> > > freebsd
> 
> > 
> 
> > > openbsd
> 
> > 
> 
> > > archlinux
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > > all awesome
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > > debian is kinda not
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > and opinion without justification is kinda useless.
> 
> 
> 
> ok here are the reasons
> 
> 1 package manangement
> 
> archlinux cant be beat
> 
> 2 ZFS freebsd has it
> 

Debian has it too :) It is called Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.

> 3 netbsd scheduler outperforms freebsd in mysql transaction benchmarks, and freebsd outperforms linux msot fo the time with exception when you have latest released stable kernel like archlinux
> 
> 4 openbsd is much simpler than rest and very tight n well tested not sloppy as debian, and has best firewall, so for clever programmers openbsd may be best option since simplicity is the most important thing in software
> 
> 
> 
> debain fall behind each of these 4 so give them a try for a few months on a test box, then you will come back and agree
> 
> 
> 
> I have run them all for 6+ years and thus know from experience.

And they all fall behind Debian when it comes to multiarch - which is available only in Debian and derivatives.