* Slit Ada in two languages or pragma Ada202X
@ 2014-09-09 8:13 Victor Porton
2014-09-10 9:42 ` gautier_niouzes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Victor Porton @ 2014-09-09 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
We need to implement some important new features (such as finalization by
interface instead of parent class, to say one).
But this is stopped by backward compatibility issues.
Why don't split Ada into two branches: with backward compatibility and with
new features.
Well, we could keep it one, by adding "pragma Ada202X" to differentiate old
and new sources.
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Slit Ada in two languages or pragma Ada202X
2014-09-09 8:13 Slit Ada in two languages or pragma Ada202X Victor Porton
@ 2014-09-10 9:42 ` gautier_niouzes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: gautier_niouzes @ 2014-09-10 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
An idea would be to make your own language, say Beb (traditional letter incrementation :-) ) which would quickly incorporate what you want. With a preprocessor you could perhaps even use existing Ada compilers.
_________________________
Gautier's Ada programming
http://www.openhub.net/accounts/gautier_bd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-10 9:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-09 8:13 Slit Ada in two languages or pragma Ada202X Victor Porton
2014-09-10 9:42 ` gautier_niouzes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox