comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: adam@irvine.com (Adam Beneschan)
Subject: Re: Calling through function pointer--syntax question
Date: 6 Jun 2001 15:06:09 -0700
Date: 2001-06-06T22:06:10+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4682ab7.0106061406.56fe7b0c@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B1E539E.CF306AC6@averstar.com

Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote in message news:<3B1E539E.CF306AC6@averstar.com>...
> adam@irvine.com wrote:
> > 
> > Is the last procedure call in the program ambiguous?
> 
> No.  Even if func_ptr had a default expression for
> its "param" it would still be unambiguous, because
> you need an explicit ".all" to call through a function
> pointer when there are no explicit parameters passed.
> An implicit ".all" is provided prior to "(" and ".<component>"
> but not in other places.

Sorry, I'm not following . . . the default parameter in my example is on the
function "func", not on the function *pointer*.  In the call
    P (func (5));
since an implicit .all is provided prior to "(", why couldn't this be
interpreted as
    P (func.all (5));
[here it's clear that the default parameter is passed to "func"]?

				-- Adam



  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-06 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-05 17:43 Calling through function pointer--syntax question adam
2001-06-05 19:39 ` tmoran
2001-06-06 16:17   ` Adam Beneschan
2001-06-06 16:00 ` Tucker Taft
2001-06-06 22:06   ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2001-06-07  1:22     ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-06-08 21:34       ` Adam Beneschan
2001-06-09  6:29         ` Simon Wright
2001-06-11 13:08           ` Philip Anderson
2001-06-11 17:34         ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox