From: "Marin David Condic" <mcondic.auntie.spam@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Getting a symbol table from Gnat 3.15p on Windows
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:22:26 -0500
Date: 2003-02-27T13:23:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3l3gg$bfq$1@slb4.atl.mindspring.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u1y1u6ffo.fsf@nasa.gov
An interesting chicken/egg problem. If I had a real & significant project
that used Gnat and had a need for the kind of support ACT can provide, I
could go to the customer and suggest we need a budget to pay ACT their
non-trivial support fees. But if I don't have a project that requires the
expertise of the compiler writers, nobody is going to pony-up the cashish to
pay them to answer my questions. The only way to possibly get a project
going of this sort is to demonstrate to the customer that you've got
something that could work if only they'll give you some bunch of money. I
can't do that unless I can get my questions answered concerning symbol
tables and accessibility of memory. So there you are. I'm asking on C.L.A.
because its a good source for free advice and user tips.
BTW, given the nature of the project, Gnat need not be the only player. I
already don't use Gnat for the embedded compilation, so I'm buying into all
sorts of compiler incompatibilities already. (That's a more serious
long-range problem, but one I think I could solve.) So other compilers are
possible to consider, but again, I can't go out and buy a bunch of them for
evaluation and do this "On Spec". I've got to come up with a proposal for
something I think is doable and sellable with little time and no money.
MDC
--
======================================================================
Marin David Condic
I work for: http://www.belcan.com/
My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/
Send Replies To: m c o n d i c @ a c m . o r g
"Going cold turkey isn't as delicious as it sounds."
-- H. Simpson
======================================================================
Stephen Leake <Stephen.A.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:u1y1u6ffo.fsf@nasa.gov...
> "Marin David Condic" <mcondic.auntie.spam@acm.org> writes:
>
> > Too bad Gnat doesn't seem to dump its symbol tables in a readily
accessible
> > manner.
>
> Have you tried asking ACT?
>
> --
> -- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-27 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-20 13:24 Getting a symbol table from Gnat 3.15p on Windows Marin David Condic
2003-02-20 15:15 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2003-02-21 2:16 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-20 18:30 ` Stephen Leake
2003-02-21 3:24 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-21 16:01 ` Stephen Leake
2003-02-21 16:14 ` Preben Randhol
2003-02-21 6:37 ` sk
2003-02-21 12:38 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-21 20:02 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-02-21 21:33 ` Stephen Leake
2003-02-22 15:01 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-22 5:46 ` sk
2003-02-22 15:23 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-22 18:05 ` Jeffrey Creem
2003-02-23 15:06 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-24 18:30 ` Simon Wright
2003-02-25 12:56 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-26 1:26 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-02-26 13:27 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-26 18:10 ` tmoran
2003-02-27 13:11 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-27 18:01 ` tmoran
2003-02-28 12:08 ` Marin David Condic
2003-02-28 18:18 ` tmoran
2003-02-28 20:24 ` tmoran
2003-03-01 18:25 ` John R. Strohm
2003-02-26 18:54 ` Stephen Leake
2003-02-27 13:22 ` Marin David Condic [this message]
2003-02-27 17:14 ` Stephen Leake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-21 3:24 David C. Hoos, Sr.
2003-02-21 4:00 ` Marin David Condic
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox