From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Full view of limited extension?
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-10-27T00:56:28-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1a53e68-ef4a-48a7-92aa-088f76383f5b@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nur5uc$er0$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 11:08:03 PM UTC+2, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> >>So it's both required and forbidden,
Sorry for confusion - actually, the syntax that you proposed is accepted by my compiler (5.4.0) and seems to work. There are so many keywords involved in the complete type definition that the proper sequencing matters. :-)
Thank you for the hints. I will confirm the fix with the other compiler versions that I have access to.
--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-27 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 6:24 Full view of limited extension? Maciej Sobczak
2016-10-18 7:22 ` G.B.
2016-10-18 7:30 ` Vratislav Podzimek
2016-10-18 15:22 ` Tero Koskinen
2016-10-20 0:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-10-26 13:36 ` Maciej Sobczak
2016-10-26 21:02 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-10-26 21:08 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-10-27 7:56 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2016-10-29 4:06 ` Coyo T Stormcaller
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox