From: "Frode Tennebø" <frode@tennebo.com>
Subject: Re: ADA vs JAVA sockets
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:23:06 +0100
Date: 2004-01-07T23:23:06+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as0itb.qme.ln@leia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: btggi3$evu$1@e3k.asi.ansaldo.it
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 09:39 Riccardo wrote:
> Can I say thet JAVA brings such kind of problems?
> (the same program in ADA works fine with an application written in
> C++)
As severel has said before, UDP does not guarantee delivery. My GUESS
is that the Ada end writes to the socket faster than the Java end can
consume it resulting in the OS' UDP buffer going full resulting in
packet loss.
-Frode
--
^ Frode Tenneb� | email: frode@tennebo.com | Frode@IRC ^
| with Standard.Disclaimer; use Standard.Disclaimer; |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 8:39 ADA vs JAVA sockets Riccardo
2004-01-07 13:31 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-07 16:28 ` Jano
2004-01-07 19:44 ` Pascal Obry
2004-01-07 21:11 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-08 14:31 ` Gnat 3.15p bugs (was: ADA vs JAVA sockets) Jano
2004-01-08 16:24 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-08 19:14 ` Jano
2004-01-08 20:16 ` tmoran
2004-01-08 20:58 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-07 14:24 ` ADA vs JAVA sockets Stephen Leake
2004-01-07 15:43 ` Steve
2004-01-07 22:23 ` Frode Tennebø [this message]
2004-01-08 7:09 ` David Marceau
2004-01-08 8:32 ` More details on:--- ADA vs JAVA sockets--- Riccardo
2004-01-08 20:16 ` tmoran
2004-01-09 7:27 ` Riccardo
2004-01-09 8:45 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2004-01-09 10:27 ` thanks Riccardo
2004-01-09 13:58 ` thanks Robert Spooner
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox