From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Pondering what rationale behind record type
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 09:32:29 +0200
Date: 2011-05-11T09:32:30+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arg008wf2qge$.ob1zmf6mdqh4.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: cfb0613e-981d-4691-b700-df1475bd03b3@r35g2000prj.googlegroups.com
On Tue, 10 May 2011 07:20:21 -0700 (PDT), Martin wrote:
[...]
> Doesn't 'type' become redundant at this point?...
At which point? (:-))
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-09 17:47 Pondering what rationale behind record type Anh Vo
2011-05-09 18:59 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-05-09 19:51 ` Niklas Holsti
2011-05-09 20:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-09 20:12 ` Anh Vo
2011-05-09 22:03 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-05-10 7:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-10 10:12 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-05-10 12:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-10 12:18 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-05-10 12:50 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-10 14:20 ` Martin
2011-05-11 7:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2011-05-11 2:28 ` Shark8
2011-05-11 7:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-18 22:55 ` Shark8
2011-05-19 8:12 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-09 20:49 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-05-19 9:50 ` J-P. Rosen
2011-05-20 6:10 ` anon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox