From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Subject: Re: Problem with Booch iterators
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:47:48 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2002-11-15T12:47:48+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar2qdj$800$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1ec946d1.0211141641.2f5b6d9d@posting.google.com
Matthew Heaney <mheaney@on2.com> wrote:
: If dynamic polymorphism for containers were needed by a user, then he
: could implement that himself using an Adapter pattern. Dynamic
: polymorphism does NOT need to be provided by the library itself.
Is it still an adequate characterization if I rewrite this as follows:
If dynamic polymorphism for containers is wanted by a library user,
then he will have to implement that himself, for example using
an Adapter pattern. Dynamic polymorphism is not provided by the
library itself.
-- georg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-15 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-09 12:28 Problem with Booch iterators Victor Porton
2002-11-09 19:43 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-11 5:47 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-11 15:45 ` Ted Dennison
2002-11-13 19:39 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-14 6:44 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-15 0:41 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-15 12:47 ` Georg Bauhaus [this message]
2002-11-16 7:37 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox