From: "Rob Veenker" <veenker@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: PDA Ada
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:43:29 +0200
Date: 2002-10-13T12:42:37+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aobpnt$e6$1@news1.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3da62ce4$0$1428$272ea4a1@news.execpc.com
The JGNAT solution also applies to Pocket PC devices such as the iPAQ.
We are about to finish a military application that runs on a ruggedised
iPAQ. It uses a military radio for data communications and this protocol is
100 % Ada. Only the GUI part is Java.
Because the protocol was implemented in Ada, We could use the same code on a
Windows NT box :-)
"John Kern" <jkern3@corecomm.net> wrote in message
news:3da62ce4$0$1428$272ea4a1@news.execpc.com...
> If you are already prepared to use Java for the Palm computer, you might
> want to check out the
> JGNAT to Palmtm Demo
> available on the ACT website at the bottom of this page:
> http://www.gnat.com/texts/products/prod_java.htm
> I downloaded it a while back, but haven't yet had the time to get it
> working.
>
> Adrian Hoe wrote:
>
> > Richard Riehle wrote:
> >
> > > In a conversation with a colleague yesterday, the topic
> > > of PDA's came up, yet again. We have a lot of projects
> > > funded for using wireless technology and PDA's such as
> > > the Palm and IpaQ. He would be willing to let peole
> > > use Ada if there were compilers available.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know if there is any on-going effort to
> > > create an Ada compiler for PDA's. We are going to
> > > miss a huge market opportunity if we fail to be ready
> > > for this burgeoning part of the embedded marketplace.
> > >
> > > At present, no one in the PDA community takes Ada
> > > seriously because there are no compilers. I fear no
> > > one in the compiler publishing community takes
> > > PDA's seriously because there are no customers.
> > >
> > > The Ada compiler publishers have always, with a
> > > few exceptions now and then, operated on a risk
> > > averse model with regard to products. I suppose
> > > that is what we can expect again. Unless there is
> > > customer demand, there will be no compiler. Meanwhile,
> > > there are no customers demanding Ada for PDA's because
> > > they have other alternatives.
> > >
> > > Richard Riehle
> > >
> > >
> >
> > My colleagues and I are longing for an Ada compiler for many years
> > now. Sadly, we have to develop PDA application using C and Java. Yucks!
> >
> > We want Ada for PDAs!
> > --
> > type Dmitry is new Adrian; -- Adrian Hoe
> > -- http://adrianhoe.com
> > -- Remove *nospam* to email
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-10 2:23 PDA Ada Richard Riehle
2002-10-10 12:06 ` Martin Dowie
2002-10-10 12:26 ` Marin David Condic
2002-10-10 13:44 ` Ted Dennison
2002-10-10 14:43 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-10-10 20:25 ` Michael Bode
2002-10-11 3:47 ` Adrian Hoe
2002-10-14 12:53 ` Porting GNAT to a new target, was: " Simon Clubley
2002-10-14 15:51 ` Adrian Hoe
2002-10-11 5:46 ` Vadim Godunko
2002-10-11 8:57 ` Steffen Huber
2002-10-11 13:51 ` Ted Dennison
2002-10-10 14:39 ` Adrian Hoe
2002-10-11 1:44 ` John Kern
2002-10-13 12:43 ` Rob Veenker [this message]
2002-10-14 3:46 ` Adrian Hoe
2002-10-14 11:35 ` Dr. Michael Paus
2002-10-14 15:33 ` Wes Groleau
2002-10-15 11:43 ` Rob Veenker
2002-10-18 12:47 ` Dr. Michael Paus
2002-10-21 6:33 ` Rob Veenker
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox