From: "Per Jakobsen" <pdj@dontwork.dk>
Subject: Re: RTL for GNAT?
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:45:43 +0200
Date: 2002-10-03T13:45:43+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anhakb$dkc$1@news.net.uni-c.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u65wm1bsq.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov
"Stephen Leake" <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote:
> This is just a hard question, not a stupid one.
Thanks :-)
> One approach is to use 'pragma No_Run_Time' in gnat.adc. That places
> severe restrictions on your code; it assumes there is no operating
> system, so it forbids tasking, heap allocations, etc. If you can live
> with that, it is by far the easiest way to go.
Hmm, not usable: The multitasking-capability of the language is essential.
> Beyond that, there are a few research projects that are writing
> GNAT-specific kernels, that provide the minimum needed for full Ada.
> See recent issues of Ada Letters at
> http://www.acm.org/sigada/ada_letters/index.html (seems to be down
> just now).
>
> Good luck!
Thanks a lot :-)
Best regards
Per
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 7:57 RTL for GNAT? Per Jakobsen
2002-10-01 14:19 ` Stephen Leake
2002-10-03 11:45 ` Per Jakobsen [this message]
2002-10-03 13:43 ` Per Jakobsen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox