From: Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Subject: Re: Improving the first contact with Ada (was: GCC conflict on Ubuntu for mixed Ada/C++ project)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:29:58 +0100
Date: 2010-07-06T13:29:58+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1007061316390.20518@64bit-RedHat-Enterprise-Linux6beta> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <096e5f19-ed4d-4c02-b889-88856ac0d5c7@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 13706 bytes --]
I do not have time to follow this thread, but the quoted post made me
say to an outsider earlier than I was going to that trying to install
an Ada compiler would be a good idea. An excerpt of a report of how
this was not accomplished is quoted at the end of this post.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, zeta_no sent:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"On May 24, 6:45 pm, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote: |
| |
|> Which tutorials specifically did you use and which ones were bad? How |
|> would you suggest improving them? |
|> |
|> Also, do you actually _learn_ anything in tutorials? I mean, do you |
|> learn the underlying concepts, the basic knowledge that empowers you, or|
|> do you only skim the surface of things and remain dependent on "experts"|
|> to guide you? |
| |
|I should not point anyone by referring directly to their tutorials, |
|but let say a came across a least 3 tutorials about concurrency |
|programming with Ada that falls short of providing meaningful insight |
|on the true capabilities of Ada in this field. They present task, |
|delays, guard etc but don't put all these concepts in 'imaging' |
|situations, which resumes the power of the tasking model. Those did |
|not referred to typical uses of Ada, real problem solving that would |
|enlighten its non naive usage. The offer for tutorials that presents |
|a classical introduction to Ada as being a general programming |
|language, with enhanced capabilities (tasking model, real-time annex |
|etc), is too important. Many like me would benefit from more |
|specialized tutorials, like let say a middle size embedded project, |
|covering simply, many or all the main concepts provided by Ada and |
|their sound usage. |
| |
|To be sure you understand my point here, I see this type of tutorial |
|as something that can be quite long and involving. Rarely you can |
|find that type of a document, that does not qualify as a book nor as a |
|quick and dirty tutorial, as being organized halfway between a master |
|thesis and a final year thesis. It treats a known subject (compared |
|with the master thesis), with solid knowledge and neat understanding |
|(compared with some final year thesis). These documents are great |
|starters to light up curiosity and understanding to then permit |
|austere books to sink in. |
| |
| |
|> It would be constructive if you could be more specific. In particular I|
|> would be very interested in ideas on how to improve the first contact a |
|> newbie can have with Ada. |
| |
|Oh yes, I have ideas! |
| |
|1. From my searches, it seems most people active with Ada are |
|registered and composed article on Ada Programming (Wikibooks). Tell |
|me if I am wrong?" |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I do not believe that this is true.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"2. A stable Ada home should be enforced (it confuses the newbs not to |
|know where this month, this year you guys are)." |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Many members of the Ada community hate or are unpleasant to each
other.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"[..] |
| |
|iv. In the beginner section, |
|a first tutorial for setting up Ada. One windows, one Linux. (if on |
|Linux GPS is crap, hide it, tutorial should be made to use emacs with |
|Ada) |
| |
| |
|> |
|> -- |
|> Ludovic Brenta." |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
This is a major problem. The aforementioned outsider reported:
!________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________!
!"[..] !
! !
!Let's start with this site: "***http://www.ada-europe.org/***". It has manuals in the html format, which I haven't spotted the first time I checked it, but a .pdf version would be fine. A list of manuals published from springer can be found, but, at least at first sight I cannot find any reviews of the book, as I do in ACCU. In fact, the site has a link to a reference manual in .pdf version, but when I try to download it... "Oops! This page appears broken. HTTP 404 - File not found." !
! !
!In this site a list of compilers can be found. Let's check the site: "***http://www.adacore.com/home/***". It is not obvious at first site that I must pay for it. Apparently from the site "***http://www.adalog.fr/freeada1.htm***" I can download a free compiler. Let's see... No, but from there I can reach a site: "***http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuada/files/***" where I can download a free compiler...I managed to download a compressed package, but now what? The help isn't really there and I suspect I can only install this compiler on Linux. If I have windows, I'm screwed...Ok, I've came across of four sites now...!
! !
!Ok, I give up...Let's try this one: "***http://www.adahome.com/***". I should not complain so much..."***http://www.adahome.com/Tutorials/Lovelace/lovelace.htm***" seems to be a tutorial for Ada...but it assumes I already now something of other languages, which is not a problem if I had tomething to write the code on and compile it. !
! !
!I do not know if this was what you expected. My problem is not buying a book, but as I told you the Glassborow's (C++) book assumes I know nothing. It is true that perhaps I coul download Quincy in the net, but he clearly tells me how tu use it and my only concern is the code. If I have an equivalent book about Ada, I won't mind buying it. I never thought of it, but perhaps I can use Quincy to write Ada? I can try... !
! !
![..]" !
!________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________!
Yours sincerely,
Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-17 3:29 GCC conflict on Ubuntu for mixed Ada/C++ project zeta_no
2010-05-18 7:53 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-18 13:40 ` zeta_no
2010-05-18 14:39 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-19 9:12 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-19 9:28 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-19 9:09 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-18 12:56 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-18 14:12 ` zeta_no
2010-05-18 14:36 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-19 9:16 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-19 9:22 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-20 10:39 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-20 12:10 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-05-24 17:04 ` zeta_no
2010-05-24 21:42 ` zeta_no
2010-05-24 22:45 ` Improving the first contact with Ada (was: GCC conflict on Ubuntu for mixed Ada/C++ project) Ludovic Brenta
2010-06-13 17:26 ` zeta_no
2010-06-13 19:25 ` Improving the first contact with Ada Ludovic Brenta
2010-06-13 19:54 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-13 20:35 ` zeta_no
2010-06-13 21:22 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-06-13 22:35 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-14 8:03 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-06-14 8:47 ` Nasser M. Abbasi
2010-06-14 9:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-06-14 9:33 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-06-15 6:48 ` Stephen Leake
2010-06-14 10:39 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-06-14 12:19 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-06-14 13:06 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-06-14 14:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-06-14 15:59 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-06-14 16:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-06-14 20:34 ` Warren
2010-06-14 9:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-06-29 2:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2010-06-14 8:35 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-07-06 20:15 ` jonathan
2010-07-06 12:29 ` Nicholas Collin Paul de Gloucester [this message]
2010-07-06 12:57 ` Improving the first contact with Ada (was: GCC conflict on Ubuntu for mixed Ada/C++ project) Ludovic Brenta
2010-07-06 13:36 ` Improving the first contact with Ada Georg Bauhaus
2010-05-25 2:26 ` GCC conflict on Ubuntu for mixed Ada/C++ project Stephen Leake
2010-06-13 20:10 ` zeta_no
2010-06-14 20:55 ` Warren
2010-06-15 13:45 ` zeta_no
2010-06-15 15:15 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-06-15 17:05 ` Niklas Holsti
2010-05-25 2:15 ` Stephen Leake
2010-05-18 22:38 ` Ludovic Brenta
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox