From: Stefan.Lucks@uni-weimar.de
Subject: Re: improvements for multidimensional arrays ?
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 10:06:11 +0200
Date: 2018-05-17T10:06:11+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805170959290.5177@hexenstieg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7b818c4-235c-4ce5-a914-6e5b157337a6@googlegroups.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]
On Wed, 16 May 2018, Mehdi Saada wrote:
> Is it likely or not that we see some improvements over multidimensional arrays ?
Why?
> But it should be allowed to provide a proper initial value at initialization.
> Imagine a matrix whose first row and first column's elements are all at zero.
What is wrong with the code below?
type Matrix is array (Natural range <>, Natural range <>) of Natural;
M1: Matrix(1 .. 10, 1 .. 5) :=
(1 => (others => 0), -- first row 0
others => (1 => 0, others => 1) -- first column in other rows 0,
-- all other entries 1
);
M2: Matrix(1 .. 10, 1 .. 5) :=
(1 => (others => 0), -- first row 0
others => (1 => 0, others => <>) -- first column in other rows 0,
-- all other entries left undefined
);
-------- I love the taste of Cryptanalysis in the morning! --------
www.uni-weimar.de/de/medien/professuren/mediensicherheit/people/stefan-lucks
----Stefan.Lucks (at) uni-weimar.de, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 0:32 improvements for multidimensional arrays ? Mehdi Saada
2018-05-17 8:06 ` Stefan.Lucks [this message]
2018-05-17 11:32 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-17 16:38 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2018-05-17 17:21 ` Mehdi Saada
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox