Re: Build language with weak typing, then add scaffolding later to strengthen it?

[Peter Chapin <PChapin@vtc.vsc.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 520 bytes --]

On Fri, 29 May 2015, Björn Lundin wrote:

> If you ask around enough, you will likely get answers that wants to keep 
> 'odd' features. I - for example - love the separate construct. we use it 
> a lot. But I think not too many use it.

I also like using subunits now and then. It seems like a good fit when I 
have a package with one unusually large subprogram that dominates the 
package's physical content, but is just not important enough, or logically 
distinct enough, to make into its own unit.

Peter