From: Ingo Marks <nospam_adv@region-nord.de>
Subject: Re: OO dot notation
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:05:42 +0200
Date: 2002-08-15T18:05:42+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajgjer$u88$04$1@news.t-online.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1029357303.33848@master.nyc.kbcfp.com
Hyman Rosen wrote:
> For all those who have been arguing that Ada would be much
> more successful if it allowed the object.method() syntax,
> it might be interesting to check out some of the goings on
> in comp.lang.c++.moderated, in the 'Guru of the Week #84'
> threads. Many of the C++ cognoscenti are coming to the
> conclusion that the method(object) notation is superior,
> and indeed that as few functions as possible should be made
> methods of a class.
It seems to me that the world isn't "mature" for Ada yet like Unix wasn't
mature for the masses years ago until the first affordable powerful PCs
came up. Maybe in the future Ada will enjoy a "revival" when people demand
more powerful languages and discover the advantages of Ada.
Could be!
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-15 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-14 20:35 OO dot notation Hyman Rosen
2002-08-15 4:03 ` Pat Rogers
2002-08-15 16:05 ` Ingo Marks [this message]
2002-08-16 16:00 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-16 19:44 ` Jim Rogers
2002-08-16 20:09 ` Hyman Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox