Re: Literate Programming

[Martin <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>]

On Sep 8, 5:30 pm, Yannick Duchêne Hibou57 <yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr>
wrote:
> On 8 sep, 14:14, Martin <martin.do...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd question that...
>
> > ...I've never met anyone who liked HOOD - irrespective of whether they
> > liked Ada or not.
>
> > Cheers
> > -- Martin
>
> I've just noticed that the word “ Ada ” as an occurence frequency in
> web page where the word “ HOOD ” appears. So let say HOOD users like
> Ada (I may have made a wrong short-cut asserting the other way first,
> but this one is probably true enough).
>
> So to be more formal, we do not have Ada <=> HOOD, but we have HOOD =>
> Ada (confusion of <=> and => is a common mistake of beginners with
> formal logic).

:-)

There was a time (mid, to late 80's) when HOOD/Ada was used together
quite a bit. They were both 'mandated' tools on EuroFighter. We took a
look at the HOOD tools and promptly dumped it in favour of Teamwork/
RTSA-OOD (the Ward-Mellor variety), which stood up pretty well, once
the method => teamwork mapping had been done.

Cheers
-- Martin