From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: formal package question
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2011-02-15T00:17:01-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afb2ade9-aac0-4b6d-82b7-3afdd65715e7@s11g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b46c934d-b89e-4fe0-8980-c275b6bb7681@s29g2000pra.googlegroups.com
ytomino wrote on comp.lang.ada:
> I tried to remove "others =>", and got same result that it compiled
> correctly.
> umm...
> This behavior of compiler limits using formal parameter...
> I want to write partial parameters and use defaults for remaining
> parameters.
>
> But gcc(GNAT) can compile the example inhttp://www.adaic.org/resources/add_content/standards/05rm/html/RM-12-...
> I deduce, this behavior is applied only to generic package having
> formal package having formal subprograms ???
>
> Thank you.
I reported this bug as http://gcc.gnu.org/PR47748 for you.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-14 2:46 formal package question ytomino
2011-02-14 6:51 ` anon
2011-02-15 0:08 ` ytomino
2011-02-14 9:59 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-02-14 15:38 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-02-15 0:31 ` ytomino
2011-02-15 8:17 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2011-02-17 0:58 ` ytomino
2011-02-17 7:05 ` Ludovic Brenta
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox