Re: case tools

[martin.dowie@btopenworld.com (Martin Dowie)]

Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message news:<x7vllz1x4wa.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>...
> martin.dowie@btopenworld.com (Martin Dowie) writes:
> 
> I guess I meant "code generation features".
> 
> As I remember Rose Ada, you could specfy for an individual class --
> amongst many other features -- whether you wanted a
> pointer-to-instance type, what it was to be called, and what an
> automatically-generated parameter of this type was to be called
> (defaults project-selectable, eg yes, Handle and This).
> 
> This is "architectural" in the sense that if you're to be easily able
> to write code to access structures generated from my part of the
> model, it's a great help if you can _know_ what the code generation
> rules are, without the possibility of my changing my part of the
> mapping on a whim.

Ah, ok, to me this a management thing rather than anything to
do with any UML<=>Ada mapping. If you have a process that says
"use the default tool settings" and someone doesn't then you
take them outside and shoot them!

And if you don't have a process, well, nuff said. :-)