Re: thick? thin? binding

[Immanuel Scholz <news@kutzsche.net>]

Stephen Leake wrote:

> A "Thick binding" to Win32 would use either Ada access types or just
> "in out" parameters, instead of System.Address. It would also use Ada
> String instead of null-terminated strings. Typically, this requires
> intermediate code to convert between the too. The amount of this
> intermediate code determines the "thickness" of the binding.

So the MFC is a thick binding from Win32-C-API to C++ ?  :-)
(Err, in some places this binding is really thin).


This also means thick binding is better but slower.

Immanuel Scholz