From: Scott Loyd <loyd.scott@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: From 16 bit to 32
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2013-01-14T13:09:18-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aee35424-5b31-4723-aa6f-98914f36cee5@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3fc4db9-a940-47c2-91c3-84b457d733a4@googlegroups.com>
I think the representation clauses were originally used as a debugging aid so they knew where all the right bits were instead of worrying about how pragma pack would arrange things, and I think the addresses were grouped in as a matter of completeness.
I don't see any reason to keep them around from where I am standing either so I may just remove them all as you suggested.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-14 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-14 20:21 From 16 bit to 32 Scott Loyd
2013-01-14 20:52 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-01-14 21:09 ` Scott Loyd [this message]
2013-01-15 22:27 ` Stephen Leake
2013-01-15 0:14 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-01-15 0:34 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-01-15 2:40 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-01-15 0:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-01-15 14:40 ` Robert A Duff
2013-01-15 15:47 ` Scott Loyd
2013-01-15 19:12 ` J-P. Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox