From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A simple question about the "new" allocator
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-08-13T08:04:59-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae796165-3ecd-4a48-a0db-3e3963e9fbe2@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2g7jja99fq2x$.5crvfujapxfi$.dlg@40tude.net>
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:36:43 AM UTC-7, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> > This isn't really relevant to the real world, since hopefully nobody would
> > write My_Storage_Pool like that.
>
> Why? "Proxy pools" are quite useful.
Sorry, I meant specifically allocating a block of storage on the heap, reserving a large chunk of memory, *and* forgetting to deallocate it at the end. I hope nobody would write My_Storage_Pool like that. My fault, I didn't express myself clearly.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-12 6:54 A simple question about the "new" allocator NiGHTS
2014-08-12 7:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-08-12 13:38 ` G.B.
2014-08-12 10:29 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-12 18:49 ` Shark8
2014-08-12 19:10 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-12 21:53 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-08-12 22:34 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-12 23:14 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-12 23:41 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-13 7:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2014-08-13 15:04 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2014-08-13 20:32 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-08-12 15:10 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-08-12 16:07 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-12 19:58 ` Robert A Duff
2014-08-12 17:51 ` NiGHTS
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox