From: I R T <rambam@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: Just Passing By
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:44:12 GMT
Date: 2004-06-09T04:44:12+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aczdgx2a.fsf@pop-server.bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.74.1086688088.391.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
"Andrew Carroll" <andrew@carroll-tech.net> writes:
>> including a rationale for rewriting BIND.
> Rational? It's currently written in C, need I say more?
Yes.
Bind works well.
Who is likely to use AdaBIND ?
Why waste time and resources if you are just going to reinvent the wheel ?
Look at Subversion.
They took the idea of CVS and reimplemented it, IMPROVING it markedly along
the way.
If you are just going to do bind in ada, why bother ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-09 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-08 10:05 Just Passing By Andrew Carroll
2004-06-08 11:53 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-06-08 18:58 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-06-08 17:43 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2004-06-09 4:44 ` I R T [this message]
2004-06-09 6:13 ` Martin Krischik
2004-06-09 7:45 ` I R T
2004-06-09 12:47 ` Ludovic Brenta
2004-06-09 15:34 ` Martin Krischik
2004-06-09 16:05 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-06-10 6:24 ` Martin Krischik
2004-06-10 9:35 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-06-10 14:22 ` Björn Persson
2004-06-09 14:42 ` Company thoughts Björn Persson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-09 10:43 Just Passing By Andrew Carroll
2004-06-09 10:48 ` I R T
2004-06-09 12:48 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox