From: Ingo Marks <adv@region-nord.de>
Subject: Re: [OT] Gnat cross compiling FreeBSD to Win32 ?
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:02:28 +0200
Date: 2002-05-14T12:02:28+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abqnaf$ogc$01$1@news.t-online.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gbu0euoblrr1vmeb21tiarhmv4aqqih7lv@4ax.com
James Ross wrote:
> On 13 May 2002 07:33:44 -0700, Ted Dennison wrote:
> Most people can't :( Even if assuming you have seamless networking
> between your home and work, you still have to deal with file
> conversion (and isn't that a faulty process?).
MS has shot itself into its feet with their new customer-unfriendly License
6.0 which forces them to buy every software upgrade (if they need it or
not) raising software costs between 33% and 107%. Gartner and Giga state
that about 30% of MS customers are not willing to sign the new license and
other 30% don't know yet if they should. Many will switch to Linux and
StarOffice.
> Windows is the best consumer available OS period.
... until MacOSX came ;-)
> lack of standards and ease of use. The mentality that the primary
> interface is the command line and the only way to really install
> something is to ./configure will prevail on Linux for years to come.
> JR
That simply isn't true. Current Linux distributions provide precompiled
(binary) applications and use nice-looking graphical administration tools
which makes program installation a toy, even for beginners. Command shells
are _not_ necessary to maintain a Linux system, but in many situations they
make your work done much faster than clicking through several menus.
Keep in mind that most users buy pre-installed and pre-configured
Windows-PCs. IMHO pre-installed and pre-configured Linux-PCs could be the
same userfriendly as Windows PCs - even more secure and stable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-14 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-03 3:11 Gnat cross compiling FreeBSD to Win32 ? Robert R. Beaver
2002-05-03 8:57 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-04 16:12 ` Robert R. Beaver
2002-05-09 16:14 ` David Brown
2002-05-11 15:19 ` Robert R. Beaver
2002-05-11 18:17 ` Pascal Obry
2002-05-11 20:21 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-12 1:09 ` DPH
2002-05-12 9:50 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-13 12:56 ` Dave Head
2002-05-12 8:30 ` [OT] " Pascal Obry
2002-05-12 9:20 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-12 10:29 ` Pascal Obry
2002-05-13 14:33 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-14 3:51 ` James Ross
2002-05-14 8:14 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-14 15:04 ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-14 15:38 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-14 16:55 ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-14 17:28 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-14 17:57 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-14 20:45 ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-15 3:38 ` Robert R. Beaver
2002-05-14 10:02 ` Ingo Marks [this message]
2002-05-14 17:06 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-14 14:13 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-14 15:22 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-14 14:50 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-14 18:32 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-14 18:40 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-15 2:18 ` James Ross
2002-05-15 15:32 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-14 14:20 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-14 18:55 ` Darren New
2002-05-14 19:37 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-15 21:24 ` Darren New
2002-05-16 14:12 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-14 20:00 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-04 16:20 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-04 16:21 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-05 15:19 ` Robert R. Beaver
2002-05-05 15:11 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-06 0:48 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-06 3:44 ` Robert R. Beaver
2002-05-06 9:22 ` Preben Randhol
2002-05-07 21:16 ` Florian Weimer
2002-05-08 3:46 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-08 14:14 ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-09 17:46 ` Darren New
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox