From: Jean-Claude Rostaing <00120260a@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: changing rules for anonymous access types to named ones
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 14:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-04-02T14:09:06-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab5cde73-e1fa-412c-ae47-4d1f07adabe0@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e76bfb2c-7137-4e86-b91d-bb914b3e2446@googlegroups.com>
> general access type to solve the compilation error:
Yeah, but it's ugly and I won't write "access all" if if I'm not really gonna use a pointer on the stack...
I think it's a compiler issue, as like I said, I found no rules about access types, in the interface issue. Also, the interface are said to be pretty much equivalent to "type blablabla is abstract tagged null record"....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 16:39 changing rules for anonymous access types to named ones Jean-Claude Rostaing
2018-04-02 18:04 ` Jere
2018-04-02 21:09 ` Jean-Claude Rostaing [this message]
2018-04-03 8:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-04-03 11:29 ` Jean-Claude Rostaing
2018-04-03 12:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox