From: "Bobby D. Bryant" <bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:08:49 -0600
Date: 2002-04-23T07:08:49-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa3mef$8sn$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 27af1a1d6acaba932a22347a707a1d25.48257@mygate.mailgate.org
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:11:42 -0600, Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
> First he gets caught following up an article without paying attention
> to where it was being posted, so he finds someone else to blame, but
> without admitting his real concern:
Pot, kettle, plonk.
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-23 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 3:11 The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 3:43 ` Jim Rogers
2002-04-23 6:02 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 12:33 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:51 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Kent Paul Dolan Larry Kilgallen
2002-04-23 6:05 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 10:21 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-01 12:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Eric G. Miller
2002-04-23 6:12 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 6:20 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 11:48 ` chris.danx
2002-04-23 13:08 ` Bobby D. Bryant [this message]
2002-04-23 16:36 ` The inscrutable ethics of KPD and RC Wes Groleau
2002-04-27 17:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Keith Thompson
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox