From: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Are rendezvous dead?
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:36:05 +0200
Date: 2002-04-15T18:36:05+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9evlq$qba$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3CBAFB35.40102@worldnet.att.net
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]
"Jim Rogers" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net> a �crit dans le message news: 3CBAFB35.40102@worldnet.att.net...
> Ted Dennison wrote:
>
> > I personally find them complementary, not competative with each other.
>
>
> I agree. Each feature still has a valid place in Ada syntax and usage.
>
If you can read french, you'll find a paper on this topic at http://www.adalog.fr/qt5.htm
Note especially that clean termination of a multi-tasks system is much harder with protected types than with rendezvous.
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-15 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-14 8:42 Are rendezvous dead? Anatoly Chernyshev
2002-04-14 10:55 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-04-14 14:00 ` Pat Rogers
2002-04-15 13:38 ` Marin David Condic
2002-04-14 19:52 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-16 8:48 ` John McCabe
2002-04-15 14:04 ` Ted Dennison
2002-04-15 16:09 ` Jim Rogers
2002-04-15 16:36 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox