From: "Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: child packages and nested packages
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:59:30 +0100
Date: 2002-03-29T12:59:30+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a81kui$16q8$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6a6390b8.0203282130.2e4fe981@posting.google.com
> dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) wrote:
> >
> > No. I didn't say to make B a child package of A. Instead I am talking
> > about nesting B's child inside of A along with B.
>
> In the CORBA context, this would mean intertwining hand written code
> with automatically generated code:
> A.B is automatically generated while A.B.Impl is hand written.
>
> --
Er, sorry, I've just clicked the wrong button and sent this to Oliver by
e-mail:
Just a quick idea - maybe using "is separate" in some right places would
solve it? Like having the spec of A.B.Impl inside A.B, and having the body
separate.
Sergey Koshcheyev.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-29 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-23 15:02 child packages and nested packages Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-25 15:01 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-25 19:26 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-25 22:31 ` Stephen Leake
2002-04-23 21:44 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-04-24 14:52 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-26 14:21 ` Marin David Condic
2002-03-28 9:51 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-28 14:49 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-28 18:30 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-28 22:13 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-29 5:30 ` Oliver Kellogg
2002-03-29 11:59 ` Sergey Koshcheyev [this message]
2002-03-29 15:14 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-29 13:05 ` Oliver Kellogg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-04 5:37 Oliver Kellogg
2010-03-04 14:55 ` Admin - Do Not Email
2010-03-04 16:12 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox