Re: Language support for flexible handling of system-detected errors.

["Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org>]

This is a fair objection and one I have leveled myself from time to time. It
would be really nice to have a highly integrated IDE - as well as
significant libraries to speed development with leverage.

Here's a question that might help the Ada crowd out by getting a critic's
perspective: If you want a spiffy IDE (and possibly libraries) what would it
look like? (Its fair to point to some other language IDE and say "Something
like that...", but it might be more helpful to describe some specific
features.)

MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas    www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail:    marin.condic@pacemicro.com


"Maynard Handley" <name99@mac.com> wrote in message
news:name99-2703021910440001@handma2.apple.com...
> In article <3CA0A166.501E1D68@despammed.com>, wesgroleau@despammed.com
wrote:
>
> No it doesn't. Where do I get my Ada IDE for Mac or Windows at a
> reasonable price (<$250)? Note I say IDE---I'm not interested in some
> crappy suite of separate editor, compiler, linker, debugger all of which
> are driven by command-line and are a total pain in the ass to use for any
> program larger than a toy.
>
> Languages that don't provide what current programmers want and expect are
> dead. You can whine all you like about how much I suck because I expect an
> IDE, but I am simply telling you the way it is.
>
> Maynard