From: David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu>
Subject: Re: Why not using [] instead of () for array?
Date: 27 Feb 2002 14:29:28 GMT
Date: 2002-02-27T14:29:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5iqg8$8i41@news.cis.okstate.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3C7B3FC1.734F9367@mida.se
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:56:49 +0100, Mats Karlssohn <mats@mida.se> wrote:
> I don't know the linguistic term for the little ring.
I don't know a linguistic term, but Unicode/ISO 10646 (which more or
less is the standard for character names in the computer world) calls it
simply RING ABOVE.
--
David Starner - starner@okstate.edu
What we've got is a blue-light special on truth. It's the hottest thing
with the youth. -- Information Society, "Peace and Love, Inc."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-27 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 1:19 Why not using [] instead of () for array? Adrian Hoe
2002-02-25 1:48 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-02-25 3:14 ` Darren New
2002-02-25 10:14 ` Peter Hermann
2002-02-25 3:23 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-02-25 5:28 ` David Starner
2002-02-25 14:39 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-26 7:56 ` Mats Karlssohn
2002-02-27 4:52 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-27 16:44 ` Darren New
2002-02-27 14:29 ` David Starner [this message]
2002-02-27 0:50 ` Adrian Hoe
2002-02-27 17:37 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-02-25 18:46 ` Toshitaka Kumano
2002-02-27 4:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-27 8:48 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-02-28 5:29 ` Adrian Hoe
2002-02-28 21:39 ` Florian Weimer
2002-02-27 1:09 ` Adrian Hoe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-28 6:37 Christoph Grein
2002-02-28 22:56 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox