From: "tony gair" <tonygair@nespamtome.btinternet.com>
Subject: Complexity of protected objects
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 16:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2002-02-25T16:28:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5dont$dh9$1@helle.btinternet.com> (raw)
I'm considering using a protected object to store an AVL tree and also to
write and read files,
normally I would have used tasks for this, but I wish to experiment
slightly.
J Barnes recommends that protected objects be as small as possible, so
being a little
bloody minded I want to see what the limits are for protected objects ,
I would be very interested to see unusual protected objects people have
created, which
do things protected objects were not designed for (is this an oxymoron?).
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 16:28 tony gair [this message]
2002-02-25 16:45 ` Complexity of protected objects Marin David Condic
2002-03-03 1:11 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 4:13 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-03-03 19:50 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-25 17:35 ` Jim Rogers
2002-02-28 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2002-02-28 23:32 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-03-01 5:45 ` Jim Rogers
2002-03-03 0:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-01 17:42 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 1:06 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 6:53 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 19:36 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 20:04 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 0:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 0:32 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-25 22:01 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-03 1:08 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-03-04 16:44 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox