From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Subject: Re: Ada 2012 BNF syntax summary incomplete?
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 22:53:14 +0300
Date: 2012-06-30T22:53:14+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a593pbFbriU1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7564f4d-4fc2-4666-bd1e-f3936f477217@googlegroups.com>
On 12-06-30 21:25 , Ingo Marks wrote:
> It seems to me that there are there missing items in the Ada 2012 BNF Syntax
>
> http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-P.html
>
> For instance, the following items are used but not declared:
>
> - ancestor_subtype_indication
Isn't the word "ancestor" in a different style (italic) from the rest of
the item? From the syntax point of view, the italic words should be
ignored; they give semantic information, in this case that the
subtype_indication identifies, or should identify, an ancestor subtype.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-30 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-30 18:25 Ada 2012 BNF syntax summary incomplete? Ingo Marks
2012-06-30 19:53 ` Niklas Holsti [this message]
2012-07-01 5:06 ` anon
2012-07-01 5:23 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox