From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pragma Convention() Ada2012
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-07-21T22:17:24-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a42997fc-cf8a-4cb6-a2c4-6bc6a217159b@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vchgu8w7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On Saturday, July 21, 2012 3:00:40 PM UTC-6, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> I don't think this is possible in general because the entity has
> usually been frozen at that point.
I think you're right; the Specification file *must* be able to provide the correct information on generating subprogram-calls, which is impacted by conventions, but I know you can put the convention-pragmas in the private section.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-21 19:16 pragma Convention() Ada2012 wlan.etho0
2012-07-21 20:09 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-07-21 20:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-21 21:00 ` Florian Weimer
2012-07-22 5:17 ` Shark8 [this message]
2012-07-23 0:56 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-07-23 20:37 ` Florian Weimer
2012-07-21 20:29 ` wlan.etho0
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox