From: xanthian@well.com (Kent Paul Dolan)
Subject: Re: Is Microsoft de-emphasizing C# ?
Date: 28 Apr 2003 22:24:49 -0700
Date: 2003-04-29T05:24:49+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3eaa964.0304282124.4b86fbf6@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8900o-4qh.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net
The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:
[about C# not being the only language of .NET]
> C# is 1 of 20 languages supported by, among other things, the MSIL.
> I'll admit to some curiosity as to how many languages are
> supported by Java bytecode -- Java of course being one of them.
Well, at least Ada compiles into Java bytecode as well, in at
least one commercial compiler.
Which raises an interesting point; why not Pascal, which used to
compile to a bytecode in one version (UCSD Pascal); surely a
port to translate to Java bytecode instead should be fairly
straightforward?
> However, there's a flip side: Java bytecode may support only one
> language, but that could mean it supports it very well. :-)
But on the gripping hand, targeting other language compilers
also to Java bytecode would be a tremendous portability boost
for those other languages, and give them ready access to the
massive Java libraries and open source movement. I'd love to
see a Fortran 95 to Java bytecode compiler, e.g.
xanthian.
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-29 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3EAAC29B.4050700@prodigy.net>
[not found] ` <8900o-4qh.ln1@lexi2.athghost7038suus.net>
2003-04-29 5:24 ` Kent Paul Dolan [this message]
2003-04-29 6:08 ` Is Microsoft de-emphasizing C# ? Tom Shelton
2003-04-29 6:54 ` Greg Lindahl
2003-04-29 18:35 ` Wesley Groleau
2003-04-30 2:09 ` Richard Riehle
2003-04-30 7:46 ` Tim Tyler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox