From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Which docs first?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:06:46 GMT
Date: 2001-10-16T15:06:46+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2Yy7.31304$ev2.37362@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrn9smn8m.9cq.gerhard.nospam@lilith.hqd-internal
In article <slrn9smn8m.9cq.gerhard.nospam@lilith.hqd-internal>, Gerhard
=?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4ring?= says...
>
>On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:17:15 GMT, Clueless <chris@dont.spam.me> wrote:
>>My question is this...how much time should a novice spend reviewing the
>>official Ada docs( i.e. the LRM and the Rationale), and compiler source
>
>At the start:
>
>3 %: LRM
>97 %: good book (like Barnes')
>0 %: reading GNAT sources
That 3% should all be annexes K and L. Having a glance at the first 2 pages of
Annex A wouldn't hurt either, just to get an idea of what's in there.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
No trees were killed in the sending of this message.
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-16 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-15 21:17 Which docs first? Clueless
2001-10-15 21:32 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-16 12:09 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-10-16 14:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-15 22:03 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-10-16 15:06 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-10-17 14:36 ` Ehud Lamm
2001-10-15 23:24 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-10-16 19:20 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox