From: george.priv@gmail.com
Subject: Re: How to return an empty aggregate
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2008-04-02T22:02:37-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a25c85cf-679a-49b0-95b7-e7ae22a29ece@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b06d237f-0855-4a7d-8704-3784f30ed74a@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
On Apr 2, 3:19 am, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1 Kwi, 17:00, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
>
> > return (null record);
>
> Same thing - segfault at runtime depending on the order of progenitors
> in interface composition (see my reply to Adam).
>
> --
> Maciej Sobczak *www.msobczak.com*www.inspirel.com
Sorry, maybe I am missing something but what's practical sense of
having non-abstract null record implementation of interface(s)? I am
curious if there is real-life implication of such a construct?
George.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-03 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 11:58 How to return an empty aggregate Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-01 12:54 ` Anh Vo
2008-04-01 17:18 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-04-02 7:16 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-01 13:34 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-04-01 15:00 ` Robert A Duff
2008-04-02 7:19 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-03 5:02 ` george.priv [this message]
2008-04-03 9:09 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-04 15:38 ` george.priv
2008-04-04 20:35 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-04 23:58 ` george.priv
2008-04-05 13:48 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-05 16:04 ` george.priv
2008-04-05 21:14 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-05 22:36 ` george.priv
2008-04-06 19:53 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-06 7:00 ` george.priv
2008-04-06 20:04 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-04-07 20:23 ` george.priv
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox