From: Jeffrey Carter <spam@spam.com>
Subject: Re: Bitwise XOR?
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 20:32:06 GMT
Date: 2003-10-03T20:32:06+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1lfb.278$gA1.152@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F7D6AEC.9080901@noplace.com>
Marin David Condic wrote:
> Note that *technically* speaking, I'm not "wrong" - I only observed that
> you *could* do the operations on packed arrays of boolean. I didn't say
> you *couldn't* do them on unpacked arrays. :-) Having soothed my ego,
> thanks for the correction. ;-)
>
> MDC
>
> Jeffrey Carter wrote:
>
>> Logical operations are defined on one-dimensional arrays with a
>> Boolean component type, packed or not.
Now that your ego is soothed, should I point out that a Boolean type is
type Boolean or any type derived from it?
--
Jeff Carter
"This school was here before you came,
and it'll be here before you go."
Horse Feathers
48
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-03 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-02 1:35 Bitwise XOR? David N. Maez
2003-10-02 2:03 ` sk
2003-10-02 9:01 ` John McCabe
2003-10-02 8:30 ` Adrian Knoth
2003-10-02 12:46 ` Marin David Condic
2003-10-02 12:53 ` Adrian Knoth
2003-10-02 18:15 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-10-03 12:26 ` Marin David Condic
2003-10-03 20:32 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2003-10-03 22:41 ` Marin David Condic
2003-10-03 3:14 ` Steve
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-03 10:28 Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-10-04 2:57 ` Steve
2003-10-04 3:07 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox