From: John McCabe <john@nospam.assen.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: GNATBench 2.1.0 (free) and file/procedure naming case
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:38:13 +0000
Date: 2009-03-10T11:38:13+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0kcr49vefr9gcocl7aonis52rrbjm3gu5@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: aeedd64d-89c0-47f4-9e70-f6185d35d454@v18g2000pro.googlegroups.com
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:50:59 -0700 (PDT), britt.snodgrass@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Britt,
>On Mar 9, 10:41�am, John McCabe <j...@nospam.assen.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> However the latest thing I have is that GNATBench doesn't appear to
>> maintain the casing I use for files/folders and procedure. For
>> example, I put in TestAdaProj as the project name and MyMain as the
>> main procedure and it creates folders and files called testadaproj and
>> mymain.adb respectively. Is there something I've done wrong here that
>> anyone can think of.
>Try putting the following in your GPR file:
>package Naming is
> for Casing use "mixedcase"; -- otherwise, default is "lowercase"
>end Naming;
>This is described in the GNAT User's Guide (section 11.11, Naming
>Schemes).
>I haven't tried this myself since I use GNAT's default naming
>conventions. Regarding GPR files, I've found it better to edit them
>manually (in Eclipse) rather than use the GNATbench (or GPS) project
>properties editor.
For what it's worth, chances are that may work fine, but this issue
happens when creating a project from Eclipse. If I then set that value
and rename all my files and folders to what I wanted in the first
place, the Ada Project Explorer in Eclipse gets totally lost.
It's so phenomenally frustrating; I can't see that I'm doing anything
particularly odd or unusual, yet every time I try to use GNATBench it
just seems to put all sorts of obstacles in my way instead of just
working!
Maybe it's just me!
>> Has anyone got any idea what's happening with Hibachi? That seems to
>> have gone completely dead.
>I lurk on the Hibachi mailing list. List traffic dropped to near zero
>long ago, so it is effectively dead.
Oh dear. Seemed like such a good idea.
>I don't miss it. GNATbench is
>much better if you are using GNAT as your compiler.
You're using the paid for version though aren't you? Perhaps that just
works better!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-10 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 15:41 GNATBench 2.1.0 (free) and file/procedure naming case John McCabe
2009-03-09 19:50 ` britt.snodgrass
2009-03-10 11:38 ` John McCabe [this message]
2009-03-10 12:28 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-03-10 21:27 ` sjw
2009-03-11 8:34 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-03-16 20:19 ` Brian Gaffney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox