From: "Jimmy Dub�n" <duben@fatburen.org>
Subject: Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:48:32 +0100
Date: 2001-12-23T18:48:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a058u9$ugh$1@not.sics.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x7vlmfv7879.fsf@smaug.pushface.org
>...
>...
>
>
> which is a lot simpler than what's generated without Ravenscar.
>
> This really does look like a candidate for support from those who know
> what they're talking about!
How should one contact ACT with this matter?
Should one send code along?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-23 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-18 16:28 Use of entries using Ravenscar Jimmy Dubén
2001-12-20 7:54 ` Jimmy Dubén
2001-12-20 8:46 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-20 13:52 ` Jimmy Dubén
2001-12-20 14:59 ` Stephen Leake
2001-12-20 15:14 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-20 20:34 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-21 22:47 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-22 1:52 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-22 15:27 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-22 22:56 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-23 11:02 ` martin.m.dowie
2001-12-22 12:25 ` Simon Wright
2001-12-23 18:48 ` Jimmy Dub�n [this message]
2001-12-26 18:02 ` Simon Wright
2001-12-23 20:01 ` Stephen Leake
2001-12-24 8:52 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-26 18:20 ` Simon Wright
2001-12-27 10:57 ` Jimmy Dub�n
2001-12-28 18:36 ` Simon Wright
2001-12-27 11:11 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox