Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar

["Jimmy Dub�n" <duben@fatburen.org>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1729 bytes --]


"martin.m.dowie" <martin.m.dowie@ntlworld.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:Y0PU7.16177$4z5.1732281@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
> "Jimmy Dub�n" <duben@fatburen.org> wrote in message
> news:9vti1h$183d$1@not.sics.se...
> > > Task entries are forbidden but not PO entries but you're only allowed
> > > one queued entry at a time...
> >
> > But this surely does only have one queued entry, right?
>
> One entry but my understanding of Ravenscar is that only
> 1 task may be queued on this single entry at any one time, so
> without the rest of your code, we can't make any judgement
> on that.

This is not a part of the code that is running in the system, it is just a
small subset of the code that is similar to the real code, however it does
not work!

>
>
> > > The other thing I noticed was that nothing in the code actually
> > > required this unit to be withed in at all. (true of a couple of other
> > > with's and they certainly don't need to be withed in at the spec
> > > level - with things at as low a level as possible).
> >
> > How can that affect the compiler errors?
>
> Well, I've never seen it with GNAT but I did come across another
> compiler which would did have some strange ideas about what to
> compile :-) That was a couple of years ago and there have definately
> been new releases of that compiler, so I can say if these "features"
> are still there!
>
> I presume you are using a Unix/Linux machine? On Win32 there is
> a complaint about trying to attach the ISR but no sign of your original
> problem, with or without the spurious "with"s. Sorry :-(
>

What? Am I understanding you correctly that you don'tget any compiler errors
when you are compiling these files with pragma Ravenscar ???!