From: Per Sandberg <per.sandberg@bredband.net>
Subject: Re: Platform independent calendar
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:14:40 +0100
Date: 2008-12-07T18:14:40+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <_vT_k.6630$So1.3168@newsfe01.ams2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hA2MJBH18+OJFwLn@ada-augusta.demon.co.uk>
????
The Calendar package is the same all known platform as far as i know
since that is defined by the standard.
But if you by platform independent mean using the same binary
representation for data (to be sent between machines) which is a
complete different story.
I would use XML as data carrier and use some platform independent middle
ware for transmitting data.
/Per
Mike H wrote:
> I am working (solo) on a signalling related application for a UK
> preserved railway. The system needs to be as near to totally platform
> independent as possible. As I see it, this rules out use of package
> Calendar.
>
> Rather than re-invent a wheel, I would prefer to use a pre-existing
> solution and would be grateful for suggestions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-07 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-07 15:43 Platform independent calendar Mike H
2008-12-07 16:02 ` RasikaSrinivasan
2008-12-07 17:40 ` Mike H
2008-12-07 19:38 ` Gene
2008-12-07 17:14 ` Per Sandberg [this message]
2008-12-07 18:06 ` sjw
2008-12-07 19:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-12-07 22:26 ` Maciej Sobczak
2008-12-08 8:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-12-07 23:56 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-12-08 0:15 ` Mike H
2008-12-08 2:04 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-12-08 11:46 ` Mike H
2008-12-08 7:17 ` sjw
2008-12-08 8:46 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox