From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic dispatch again
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:25:30 GMT
Date: 2001-10-09T00:25:30+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <_trw7.16605$IY3.11751097@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3BC1F97E.6EA2F1E7@san.rr.com
>Right now, my alternative is ... . Ugly.
I've *always* found that if something was ugly/difficult in Ada,
after some thought it would become clear that the approach was in
fact a poor one, and a different approach, which worked nicely in
Ada, was a better one. (Not to say that this alternative nice
approach in this case is obvious. ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-06 1:08 Dynamic dispatch again Darren New
2001-10-06 17:52 ` tmoran
2001-10-08 1:13 ` Darren New
2001-10-08 4:23 ` tmoran
2001-10-08 16:26 ` Darren New
2001-10-08 18:21 ` tmoran
2001-10-08 19:07 ` Darren New
2001-10-09 0:25 ` tmoran [this message]
2001-10-09 0:40 ` Darren New
2001-10-09 1:29 ` Larry Hazel
2001-10-09 4:10 ` tmoran
2001-10-09 15:40 ` Darren New
2001-10-09 17:58 ` tmoran
2001-10-09 19:26 ` Darren New
2001-10-09 19:42 ` tmoran
2001-10-09 20:23 ` Darren New
2001-10-09 22:37 ` tmoran
2001-10-10 18:17 ` Darren New
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox