From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Ada - to - Perl/CGI translator
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:20:34 -0600
Date: 2001-01-05T15:20:34-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWq56.1572$xo3.422153@homer.alpha.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 86r92hyh6s.fsf@acm.org
Laurent Guerby wrote in message <86r92hyh6s.fsf@acm.org>...
>Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
>> Oops, I meant GNAT.CGI indeed (Ada.CGI would be an illegal
>> extension of the language :-)
>
>Isn't an implementation free to add children to existing
>language-defined library packages? (GNAT does so.)
Not to package Ada (see A.2(4) and the associated AARM text).
Grandchildren of Ada are OK.
GNAT does *not* add any children to Ada.
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-05 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-02 22:39 Ada - to - Perl/CGI translator Bruce or Tracy
2001-01-02 23:23 ` JF Harrison
2001-01-03 0:10 ` Bruce or Tracy
2001-01-03 16:33 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-05 1:50 ` Bruce or Tracy
2001-01-05 5:27 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-05 6:48 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-05 14:07 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-05 18:42 ` Laurent Guerby
2001-01-05 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2001-01-06 17:09 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-07 13:39 ` Gisle Sælensminde
2001-01-07 14:05 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-07 15:53 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-07 15:52 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-06 4:09 ` Bruce or Tracy
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox