From: Tim Rowe <spamtrap@tgrowe.plus.net>
Subject: Re: SPARK Examiner -- visibility of Ada.Strings.Unbounded (and probably lots of other packages)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:06:16 +0000
Date: 2009-03-26T17:06:16+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNydnQRMHdSLK1bUnZ2dnUVZ8oednZ2d@posted.plusnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aab0062e-9734-406c-aa30-db9adae577b1@y13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
roderick.chapman@googlemail.com wrote:
> You'll need what we call a "shadow" package specification that
> offers a SPARK-friendly (i.e. legal SPARK) version of an
> otherwise non-SPARK package.
Many thanks -- as is so often the case, it comes down to knowing the
right terminology for what one is trying to look up!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 14:50 SPARK Examiner -- visibility of Ada.Strings.Unbounded (and probably lots of other packages) Tim Rowe
2009-03-26 15:13 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-03-26 15:18 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-03-26 15:35 ` roderick.chapman
2009-03-26 17:06 ` Tim Rowe [this message]
2009-03-26 19:13 ` Tim Rowe
2009-03-27 8:27 ` JP Thornley
2009-03-27 8:34 ` roderick.chapman
2009-03-27 16:03 ` Tim Rowe
2009-03-26 15:40 ` roderick.chapman
2009-03-26 16:15 ` Tim Rowe
2009-03-26 16:26 ` roderick.chapman
2009-03-26 16:30 ` JP Thornley
2009-03-26 16:51 ` roderick.chapman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox