comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <adaworks@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Crosstalk Article from Aonix
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:28:40 GMT
Date: 2006-02-10T08:28:40+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8YGf.28933$F_3.9344@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> (raw)

In a recent article about safety-critical software, the author,
an employee of Aonix, manages to avoid even one mention
of  Ada.  He seems to be unaware that, in the safety-critical
domain, Ada is still a much better option than Java.  In this
kind of article one would expect at least a token nod
in the direction of Ada from an Aonix author . C and C++
are mentioned often. This is a rather glaring considering that
Aonix was once an important player in the world of Ada.

The Aonix web site, to be fair, does continue to feature their
Ada products.  One wonders whether Ada is still a significant
percentage of their revenue.

Richard Riehle





             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-10  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-10  8:28 adaworks [this message]
2006-02-10 10:29 ` Crosstalk Article from Aonix Pascal Obry
2006-02-10 12:45   ` jean-Pierre FAUCHE
2006-02-10 13:14     ` Pascal Obry
     [not found]     ` <GEELLGGKALBLGOBLCHBAOEMJCNAA.erik@delta-utec.com>
2006-02-10 19:37       ` Colin Paul Gloster
2006-02-10 19:41         ` Ed Falis
2006-02-10 20:00           ` Colin Paul Gloster
2006-02-10 19:45     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-02-11  2:59     ` adaworks
2006-02-11  3:10   ` adaworks
2006-02-10 15:20 ` jimmaureenrogers
2006-02-10 21:00 ` Mike Silva
2006-02-11  7:05   ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox