From: chris <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Yet another XML and Ada issue
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:44:04 +0100
Date: 2004-04-26T16:44:04+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3ajc.172$QY.44@newsfe3-win.server.ntli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6gp4k$aog$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> : "RELAX NG seems a valuable alternative to XQuery et al." (Marius)
> :
> : "No!
> :
> : RELAX NG is an alternative schema model, whose use should be actively
> : discouraged.
>
> Why?
I don't know. This argument is just silly. Relax NG is more powerful
than XSchema 1 and a lot less awkward. I'm unsure if it is still so
with XSchema 2 but I have little faith in the W3C anymore. It has taken
a long time for them to modularise HTML and quite a few of the
'standards' I've worked with are overly complicated and insufficient for
what they say they are for.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-26 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-25 10:02 Yet another XML and Ada issue Marius Amado Alves
2004-04-25 16:31 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-04-25 21:20 ` Robert C. Leif
2004-04-26 8:11 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-04-26 15:44 ` chris [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox