From: "Peter C. Chapin" <pchapin@sover.net>
Subject: Re: private types
Date: 20 Mar 2006 10:58:12 GMT
Date: 2006-03-20T10:58:12+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Xns978C3CC16F9D7pchapinsovernet@198.186.192.137> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dvlu9d$mg6$1@sunnews.cern.ch
Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in
news:dvlu9d$mg6$1@sunnews.cern.ch:
> Where did you read this?
> NULL is not depreciated. It's defined in the <cstddef> header to be a
> null-pointer constant, which is any integral const expression that
> evaluates to 0. Possible definition is:
>
> #define NULL 0
>
> Note: the following is explicitly prohibited:
>
> #define NULL (void*)0
This defintion of NULL is not workable in C++. This is because C++ does
not allow pointers to void to be put into other pointer types without a
cast. If the above definition was used the following would be an error:
int *p = NULL;
Thus in C++, NULL must be defined as the literal "0". Note that this
issue does not come up in C because C's type system is more permissive.
Thus the (void*)0 is often used in C.
Because "NULL" just expands to "0" in C++, code using NULL can at times
be misleading. For example consider
void f(int);
void f(char *);
f(NULL); // Ambiguous, could call either f(int) or f(char *).
This is a surprising error. Other surprises come up when passing NULL to
functions taking a variable number of arguments. Type checking is
essentially turned off for the variable arguments and thus if integers
and pointers have different representations or if the NULL pointer must
be handled in a special way (not all bits zero), errors can occur
printf("The address is: %p\n", NULL);
In C++ this passes the integer zero to printf, not a pointer. The
compiler can't understand that "0" is a null pointer constant in this
context because it doesn't know what type the second argument to printf
is supposed to be.
For these reasons many C++ experts recommend using "0" explicitly to
represent NULL pointers and not the symbol NULL. This makes the problems
above more apparent in the source and thus more likely that the
programmer will notice them.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-20 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 19:58 private types ada_student
2006-03-13 20:27 ` Mark Lorenzen
2006-03-13 21:05 ` Pascal Obry
2006-03-13 21:07 ` ada_student
2006-03-13 21:45 ` Simon Wright
2006-03-14 4:51 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-14 7:44 ` Brian May
2006-03-14 8:25 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-03-14 8:47 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-03-17 4:33 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-17 5:17 ` Brian May
2006-03-17 22:50 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18 1:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18 2:17 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-21 0:08 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18 8:39 ` Uninitialized variables (was: Re: private types) Dirk Craeynest
2006-03-18 14:06 ` Gautier
2006-03-18 14:36 ` Uninitialized variables Jeffrey Creem
2006-03-21 0:22 ` Uninitialized variables (was: Re: private types) Randy Brukardt
2006-03-21 0:38 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18 12:06 ` private types Martin Dowie
2006-03-18 12:47 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-17 7:40 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-17 16:41 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-03-17 23:36 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18 1:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18 3:21 ` Handling invalid objects Justin Gombos
2006-03-18 7:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-18 16:10 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-19 11:00 ` Simon Wright
2006-03-20 23:57 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-22 2:06 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-22 5:23 ` tmoran
2006-03-22 8:48 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-22 9:24 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-22 11:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-22 16:42 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-22 18:06 ` Stefan Lucks
2006-03-23 13:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-18 8:57 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2006-03-19 19:07 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-03-20 15:25 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-19 22:06 ` Brian May
2006-03-20 21:17 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-20 23:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-22 1:27 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18 9:20 ` private types Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-17 13:18 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-17 23:44 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18 9:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-18 12:56 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-18 15:06 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-19 9:35 ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-19 14:52 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-03-19 15:08 ` Björn Persson
2006-03-19 16:34 ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-20 9:57 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 10:58 ` Peter C. Chapin [this message]
2006-03-20 11:19 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-03-20 13:06 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 15:19 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-20 16:47 ` James Dennett
2006-03-20 19:12 ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-21 7:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 19:32 ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-21 7:41 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 20:29 ` Simon Wright
2006-03-19 17:43 ` Larry Kilgallen
2006-03-19 22:11 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-03-19 18:15 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-19 19:20 ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-19 20:43 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-03-20 15:01 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-27 4:07 ` Dave Thompson
2006-03-20 9:40 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 15:09 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-21 8:07 ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-26 18:53 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-19 19:27 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-25 21:40 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 0:10 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-26 1:00 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 6:37 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-26 15:43 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-26 16:32 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 16:51 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 19:41 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-26 3:15 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-03-26 18:28 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 19:43 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-26 19:59 ` Simon Wright
[not found] <bctruong.1.00117123@draper.com>
1999-07-28 0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
1999-07-28 0:00 ` Thomas Hood
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox