* GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
@ 2002-06-19 23:53 Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 1:06 ` Ted Dennison
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey D. Cherry @ 2002-06-19 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
I would like to give my compliments to all who participated in
incorporating GNAT into the GCC. It's a real treat to have one compiler
installation, one command shell, and be able to build programs in Ada, C,
C++, or FORTRAN 77 using the same shell and compiler. This is so cool!
A few weeks ago I downloaded the MinGW distribution of GCC 3.1 (dated 16
May 2002), installed it on my Windows 2000 machine, and compiled a bunch of
rather simple legacy Ada, C, C++, and FORTRAN 77 programs. They all ran
successfully. I installed the Win32 API and the Win32Ada bindings and
compiled several more small Ada programs that used some Win32 services.
These ran successfully as well. I then installed the Booch components and
although there were several warnings during the compile step, all the tests
and demo programs ran successfully. I compiled several of my Ada programs
that utilitze the Booch components and they ran successfully as well. I
installed an old POSIX binding (Pascal Obry's Win32POSIX) and the tests in
that distribution ran successfully. I had one Ada program that used the
POSIX binding so I tried compiling it and it ran successfully as well.
Rather pleased with all this, I downloaded the GNU Pascal Compiler,
installed it, and compiled a rather large suite of static code analysis
tools (all written in Borland Pascal with Objects, v7). After some
tweaking, they all compiled. I ran the resulting tools against some code I
had analyzed a few years ago and checked the output against the archived
copy. Except for the time and date of the analysis runs, the outputs were
identical. It's been quite a productive month.
Granted these were rather trivial tests of the compiler and bindings, but
the pessimist in me didn't think the first major distribution of the GCC
with GNAT would be able to handle it. I, quite gladly, stand corrected.
Since I teach Ada, C, and C++ part-time at the local community college,
this is a real blessing since all the students can now use the same
compiler distribution. That may not sound like much, but you wouldn't
believe how big a time-saver it is to have a single compiler configuration
for all the classes.
My full-time job uses ASIS to build some analysis tools, but I don't see an
ASIS interface available for GCC 3.1. Does anyone know if one is planned?
This isn't a real problem, since at work we'll be using GNAT 3.14p in the
foreseeable future ... but I am curious.
Once again, for anyone and everyone involved in incorporating GNAT into
GCC, thank you, thank you, thank you!
--
Regards,
Jeffrey D. Cherry
Senior IV&V Analyst
Northrop Grumman Information Technology
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-19 23:53 GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool! Jeffrey D. Cherry
@ 2002-06-20 1:06 ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-20 15:56 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 17:51 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-20 5:22 ` achrist
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ted Dennison @ 2002-06-20 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
Jeffrey D. Cherry wrote:
> My full-time job uses ASIS to build some analysis tools, but I don't see an
> ASIS interface available for GCC 3.1. Does anyone know if one is planned?
> This isn't a real problem, since at work we'll be using GNAT 3.14p in the
> foreseeable future ... but I am curious.
You may want to check the GCC mailing list archives about this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-19 23:53 GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool! Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 1:06 ` Ted Dennison
@ 2002-06-20 5:22 ` achrist
2002-06-20 17:30 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 9:34 ` steve_H
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: achrist @ 2002-06-20 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
"Jeffrey D. Cherry" wrote:
>
> I would like to give my compliments to all who participated in
> incorporating GNAT into the GCC. It's a real treat to have one
> compiler installation, one command shell, and be able to build
> programs in Ada, C, C++, or FORTRAN 77 using the same shell and
> compiler. This is so cool!
>
> A few weeks ago I downloaded the MinGW distribution of GCC 3.1 (dated
> 16 May 2002), installed it on my Windows 2000 machine, and compiled a
> bunch of rather simple legacy Ada, C, C++, and FORTRAN 77 programs.
> They all ran successfully. I installed the Win32 API and the Win32Ada
> bindings and compiled several more small Ada programs that used some
> Win32 services. These ran successfully as well. I then installed the
> Booch components and although there were several warnings during the
> compile step, all the tests and demo programs ran successfully. I
> compiled several of my Ada programs that utilitze the Booch components
> and they ran successfully as well. I installed an old POSIX binding
> (Pascal Obry's Win32POSIX) and the tests in that distribution ran
> successfully. I had one Ada program that used the POSIX binding so
> I tried compiling it and it ran successfully as > well.
>
> Rather pleased with all this, I downloaded the GNU Pascal Compiler,
> installed it, and compiled a rather large suite of static code
> analysis tools (all written in Borland Pascal with Objects, v7).
> After some tweaking, they all compiled. I ran the resulting tools
> against some code I had analyzed a few years ago and checked the
> output against the archived copy. Except for the time and date of the
> analysis runs, the outputs were identical. It's been quite a
> productive month.
>
Impressive indeed. Only about half of commercial software works that
well out of the box. For so many pieces of software from diverse
contributors to work together like that is something that should help
promote Ada at least a little.
Some questions:
1. Did you download binaries or source for all of this? (URL's?)
2. Are there step-by-step directions for setting all this up available
anywhere on-line? (URL?) (If students can do this, there must be
step-by-step directions somewhere, right?)
3. If there aren't step-by-step directions, wouldn't it be nice if there
were? If there aren't, I'd be willing to try to write some if you or
someone can point me toward what it takes to make it all happen.
TIA
Al
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-19 23:53 GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool! Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 1:06 ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-20 5:22 ` achrist
@ 2002-06-20 9:34 ` steve_H
2002-06-20 16:09 ` David Marceau
` (2 more replies)
2002-06-21 11:24 ` Marc A. Criley
2002-06-21 14:39 ` Wes Groleau
4 siblings, 3 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: steve_H @ 2002-06-20 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
hello;
Can you show examples of how to use gcc to compile Ada?
if one uses 'gcc foo.ada', what about 'gnatmake'? that is what is used
more of the time. do you then now use normal Makfile to build your software
and call 'gcc' from inside the makefile, or do you still use gnatmake?
this is confusing to me. Examples would help.
It is strange of how important adding Ada to gcc is, there is almost nothing
on the net that shows examples of how this is done, nothing on gcc web page
and nothing on ACT web page. they mentioned GNAT and gcc, but no examples,
nothing I could find.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-20 1:06 ` Ted Dennison
@ 2002-06-20 15:56 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 17:51 ` Florian Weimer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey D. Cherry @ 2002-06-20 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in
news:3D112A63.5030502@telepath.com:
>> My full-time job uses ASIS to build some analysis tools, but I don't see
>> an ASIS interface available for GCC 3.1. Does anyone know if one is
>> planned? This isn't a real problem, since at work we'll be using GNAT
>> 3.14p in the foreseeable future ... but I am curious.
>
> You may want to check the GCC mailing list archives about this.
>
I checked all the archives through the beginning of 2002. I found no mention
of "ASIS" in the subject headers of the archived e-mails. It may have been
mentioned in the body of one or more messages, but I only searched the
subjects. Do you know of a specific thread that I could check? By the way,
thanks for the suggestion, there were many threads dealing with GNAT in GCC
and some discussion of GCC 3.2 that I found interesting.
--
Regards,
Jeffrey D. Cherry
Senior IV&V Analyst
Northrop Grumman Information Technology
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-20 9:34 ` steve_H
@ 2002-06-20 16:09 ` David Marceau
2002-06-20 18:09 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-21 12:05 ` Georg Bauhaus
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: David Marceau @ 2002-06-20 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
steve_H wrote:
>
> hello;
>
> Can you show examples of how to use gcc to compile Ada?
>
> if one uses 'gcc foo.ada', what about 'gnatmake'? that is what is used
gnatmake -v -g foo.adb
> more of the time. do you then now use normal Makfile to build your software
> and call 'gcc' from inside the makefile, or do you still use gnatmake?
In a standard makefile, you will find a rule for a target ada
executable.
In this you will find gnatmake blahblah.adb. That's all.
My suggestion if you really want to see what's going on, turn on the
verbose switch
for both the make tool(make -d) and for the gnatmake tool(gnatmake -v).
This will help see what's going on with gcc and all the rest.
EMACS USAGE WHEN COMPILING WITHOUT LEARNING ADA FUNCTIONALITY FROM GNAT
MACROS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emacs is huge and has a lot of functionality. My suggestion for a first
shot use of emacs without reading up too much on it:
emacs &
crtl-d
yourdirectorywithmakefile
enter
alt-x shell
Now this all looks like a standard console but it's not. You can ctrl-s
to search for anything in the window. This is very handy.
You can also pageup an pagedown. This avoids you from having to use a
mouse in the normal terminal.
This is very handy when you know you're going to have multi-page
output. There are more ways of building with emacs, but RTFM for those.
Now getting to the recipe you have probably seen before:
RECIPE FOR COMPILING ADA PROJECTS
---------------------------------
./configure --prefix=/usr/local
make
make install
You should be able to compile the real ada projects 1)adasockets,
2)xmlada, 3)aws with the above recipe.
SOURCE CODE to COMPILE WITH ADA
-------------------------------
You want sample code go get the source/sample code from act europe for
adasockets, xmlada, aws:
http://libre.act-europe.fr/
ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES
---------------------
The above assumes you successfully compiled gcc31.
The above assumes you have set your environment variables:
export PATH=$PATH:/home/david/gcc31tars/gcc-3.1/bin
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib
export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/home/david/gcc31tars/gcc-3.1/lib
Note:These are not the official places for these. If you had problems
compiling gcc31, I have already been told this is not the place.
Go to the gcc mailing list.
AFTER DOING ALL THE ABOVE
-------------------------
Run a aws sample:
cd aws
cd demos
./hello_world
Then check out:
lynx localhost:8080
Cheers,
David Marceau
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-20 5:22 ` achrist
@ 2002-06-20 17:30 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 19:53 ` achrist
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey D. Cherry @ 2002-06-20 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
achrist@easystreet.com wrote in news:3D1166A3.4C62DDA8@easystreet.com:
> Some questions:
>
> 1. Did you download binaries or source for all of this? (URL's?)
I downloaded the source from the GNU ftp site, including the composite tar-
gzip file and all the individualt tar-gzip files for version 3.1. These
files can be found at ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gcc/gcc-3.1; however, shortly
after I had done downloaded these files, there was an announcement on CLA
that MinGW had created a binary distribution of GCC 3.1. Following the
announcement's suggestion, I went to SourceForge (http://sourceforge.net),
found the MinGW project's page (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw) and
downloaded the following files:
MinGW-1.1.tar.gz
bunutils-2_12_90-20020518-1.tar.gz
binutils-2_12_90-info-html.tar.gz
gcc-3_1-core-20020516-1.tar.gz
gcc-3_1-Ada-20020516-1.tar.gz
gcc-3_1-info-html.tar.gz
gcc-3_1-release_notes.txt
libmingwex.a
libstdc++-html-USERS-3.1.tar.gz
make-3.79.1-20010722.tar.gz
mingw-runtime-2.0-20020430.tar.gz
w32api-1.4-2.tar.gz
To download these files starting from the aforementioned MinGW project page,
(1) click on the "download" link for any of the listed packages and this will
bring you to the file list page for the project, (2) from there, click on the
desired file name and that will lead you to a page where you can select the
server from which the download will be performed, (3) click on the server
nearest your location and the download will begin, (4) return to the "file
list page" and repeat this process for each file desired.
I found out later that the libmingwex.a file was unnecessary if I installed
the MinGW 2.0 runtime and the make-3.79.1-20010722.tar.gz file was also
unnecessary since it was included in the MinGW 1.1 distribution. Since this
initial download, the Win32 API has been updated to version 1.5 and so I
would suggest getting the latest (w32api-1.5.tar.gz).
If you are interested in the Pascal compiler, then I suggest going to the
home site for GNU Pascal (http://www.gnu-pascal.de) and downloading the
Pascal compiler component from there.
>
> 2. Are there step-by-step directions for setting all this up available
> anywhere on-line? (URL?) (If students can do this, there must be
> step-by-step directions somewhere, right?)
The associated documentation for each component describes the installation
process for that particular component. Generally, you extract the files in
the tar-gzip file into a common directory tree on your hard disk. Some
components require environment variables (such as the Ada component of the
GCC). A previous post on CLA listed the steps to get the MinGW installation
up and running and they worked for me.
For distribution to students, I burn a CD (the student provided the CD) with
a rather large set of files, all of which are freely available from the
Internet. One set of files is the GNAT 3.14p distribution, another set is
the GCC 3.1 distribution from the MinGW project. Typically, I add a command
(batch) file that performs most, if not all, of the installation steps. I
also provide a text file in the root directory of the CD that describes a
manual installation, so your assumption regading "step-by-step directions" is
correct. If you, or someone else, requests a copy of the steps I used, then
I'll post them to CLA.
Please note that the GNU Pascal compiler has its own installation program
similar to most software products that run under Windows. The GNU Pascal
installation will make some small changes to the registry and also requies an
environment variable. Installing libraries (such as the CRT unit) requies
downloading the extra files and compiling them. Some additional copying of
certain files to other installation directories will also be necessary.
>
> 3. If there aren't step-by-step directions, wouldn't it be nice if there
> were? If there aren't, I'd be willing to try to write some if you or
> someone can point me toward what it takes to make it all happen.
It's always nice to have "step-by-step directions" and I can provide a text
description of the steps I used if requested (as I mentioned in passing in
the response to point number 2 above). Generally, I find the documentation
of the GCC components very well done and the GNAT documentation is
particularly good. The GNAT compiler also has about the best error and
warning messages I've ever seen from a compiler (and I've used quite a few in
my time, nearly 20 years of reviewing safety-critical software running on a
variety of different platforms).
The descriptive error messages are one thing that makes the GNAT compiler an
_excellent_ compiler for students. I've also found that first-time
programming students pick up Ada much faster than C, C++, FORTRAN, or Java.
At our school, students typically start with Ada, and then may also learn
C++, FORTRAN, or Java in later classes. This seems to work well since Ada
provides them with good fundamentals in software development, is very
readable, and the student-friendly messages from the GNAT compiler is icing
on the cake.
--
Regards,
Jeffrey D. Cherry
Senior IV&V Analyst
Northrop Grumman Information Technology
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-20 1:06 ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-20 15:56 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
@ 2002-06-20 17:51 ` Florian Weimer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2002-06-20 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:
> You may want to check the GCC mailing list archives about this.
As far as I can recall, there was no discussion on these lists.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-20 9:34 ` steve_H
2002-06-20 16:09 ` David Marceau
@ 2002-06-20 18:09 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-21 12:05 ` Georg Bauhaus
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey D. Cherry @ 2002-06-20 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
nma124@hotmail.com (steve_H) wrote in
news:8db3d6c8.0206200134.1ff139f7@posting.google.com:
> Can you show examples of how to use gcc to compile Ada?
Yes, but this is in the documentation that comes with the Ada component of
the GCC. Look in the "GNAT User's Guide" that should be in the "info-html"
subdirectory of the installation. There is an example in the section titled
"Running a Simple Ada Program" details the steps of using the gcc, gnatbind,
gnatlink sequence and the equivalent process using gnatmake.
>
> if one uses 'gcc foo.ada', what about 'gnatmake'? that is what is used
> more of the time. do you then now use normal Makfile to build your
> software and call 'gcc' from inside the makefile, or do you still use
> gnatmake?
I haven't come accross an Ada project yet that couldn't use gnatmake to build
an executable. For example, the largest Ada project I've seen is composed of
around 250K SLOC partitioned into about a dozen different executables. The
gnatmake program, with the proper command line options, was able to build
each of those programs.
The Ada language, the GNAT compilation model, and the GNAT configuration
pragmas, combined with the versatility of the GCC utilities makes the need
for a separate make facility almost completely unnecessary. However, some
projects do things like combining units provided from third-party vendors, or
object modules and libraries compiled using different high-level languages,
or target different platforms, and this requires special steps. In these
cases the GNU make facility can provide the needed versatility, and yes, the
make file will call the gcc compiler to create the dependent units. Of
course, gcc determines which compiler to use depending on the source file's
extension or a command line switch.
>
> this is confusing to me. Examples would help.
>
> It is strange of how important adding Ada to gcc is, there is almost
> nothing on the net that shows examples of how this is done, nothing on
> gcc web page and nothing on ACT web page. they mentioned GNAT and gcc,
> but no examples, nothing I could find.
I would love to provide examples and help make things more clear; however,
the documentation that comes with the GNAT component of the GCC provides
examples of compiling, linking, and running along with a vast array of
suplementary information. I doubt I could do better than what is already
available, but if you provide a specific request, I'm sure that I or others
reading CLA can elaborate on the processes involved.
Keep in mind that the process of creating executables from Ada source is the
same as it's always been, and so finding documentation on something that
hasn't changed will not be easy. For me, the big savings is having one
compiler installation that handles just about all the programming languages
that I use either personally or professionaly.
--
Regards,
Jeffrey D. Cherry
Senior IV&V Analyst
Northrop Grumman Information Technology
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-20 17:30 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
@ 2002-06-20 19:53 ` achrist
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: achrist @ 2002-06-20 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
"Jeffrey D. Cherry" wrote:
>
> It's always nice to have "step-by-step directions" and I can provide a > text description of the steps I used if requested (as I mentioned in
> passing in the response to point number 2 above).
Thanks very much for the lengthy reply. This is enough for me to get
started. If there are any other directions that will keep me out of
trouble, please feel free to post them here or email. I'll go search
Google for the message you mentioned about getting MingW Ada running.
If you can recall poster's name or approximate date, that would be
good.
I'll try to work through this, take notes as I go, and post my
play-by-play post mortem somewhere. One thing that I think would
be nice to include in the process is creating an executable that
includes sources in several languages, all compiled through gcc,
preferably with just one makefile. If the distributions you mention
don't include any simple examples that do that, any contribution
of a small example that does would be gratefully accepted.
Al
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-19 23:53 GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool! Jeffrey D. Cherry
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2002-06-20 9:34 ` steve_H
@ 2002-06-21 11:24 ` Marc A. Criley
2002-06-21 14:39 ` Wes Groleau
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc A. Criley @ 2002-06-21 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
"Jeffrey D. Cherry" wrote:
>
> My full-time job uses ASIS to build some analysis tools, but I don't see an
> ASIS interface available for GCC 3.1. Does anyone know if one is planned?
> This isn't a real problem, since at work we'll be using GNAT 3.14p in the
> foreseeable future ... but I am curious.
I know ASIS-for-GNAT is still being actively worked on, since when I
report bugs in it the ACT maintainer follows up on them right away,
despite my being an unsupported user.
Marc A. Criley, Consultant
Quadrus Corporation
www.quadruscorp.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-20 9:34 ` steve_H
2002-06-20 16:09 ` David Marceau
2002-06-20 18:09 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
@ 2002-06-21 12:05 ` Georg Bauhaus
2 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Georg Bauhaus @ 2002-06-21 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
steve_H <nma124@hotmail.com> wrote:
: Can you show examples of how to use gcc to compile Ada?
Adding to the Emacs way described earlier:
Install GLIDE! Look at the Ada menu then.
Configure your project choosing the appropriate menu item, or C-c u,
this will let you set options like switches and include paths for
non-tiny projects. Press the save button.
From then on it's a matter of either using the Ada menu again
or pressing C-c C-c or some such.
Also, M-x speedbar.
The options are saved to a file that ends in .adp
and this file can easily be used to constuct a makefile
for distribution to sites not using .adp (i.e. project) files.
This will help overcome the worst portability obstacle
ever invented (in my view): configure.
-- Georg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-19 23:53 GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool! Jeffrey D. Cherry
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2002-06-21 11:24 ` Marc A. Criley
@ 2002-06-21 14:39 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-21 14:58 ` SIMON Claude
4 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Wes Groleau @ 2002-06-21 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
> A few weeks ago I downloaded the MinGW distribution of GCC 3.1 (dated 16
> May 2002), installed it on my Windows 2000 machine, and compiled a bunch of
> rather simple legacy Ada, C, C++, and FORTRAN 77 programs. They all ran
From where did you download it? At http://www.mingw.org/
they say the latest version is 2.95.
Was Java included?
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool!
2002-06-21 14:39 ` Wes Groleau
@ 2002-06-21 14:58 ` SIMON Claude
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: SIMON Claude @ 2002-06-21 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
Wes Groleau a �crit :
>
> > A few weeks ago I downloaded the MinGW distribution of GCC 3.1 (dated 16
> > May 2002), installed it on my Windows 2000 machine, and compiled a bunch of
> > rather simple legacy Ada, C, C++, and FORTRAN 77 programs. They all ran
>
> From where did you download it? At http://www.mingw.org/
> they say the latest version is 2.95.
At sourceforge.net search gcc and then clic on MinGW...
and then on gcc ... t�l�chargement and you see the liste of all the
files.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-21 14:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-19 23:53 GCC 3.1 with GNAT ... Cool! Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 1:06 ` Ted Dennison
2002-06-20 15:56 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 17:51 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-20 5:22 ` achrist
2002-06-20 17:30 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-20 19:53 ` achrist
2002-06-20 9:34 ` steve_H
2002-06-20 16:09 ` David Marceau
2002-06-20 18:09 ` Jeffrey D. Cherry
2002-06-21 12:05 ` Georg Bauhaus
2002-06-21 11:24 ` Marc A. Criley
2002-06-21 14:39 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-21 14:58 ` SIMON Claude
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox